https://blog.redteamshell.com/tags/offensive-security/Recent content in Offensive Security on Fabrice's BlogHugoen<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY-NC 4.0</a>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400https://blog.redteamshell.com/posts/2026/06/the-floor-just-moved-project-glasswing-claude-mythos-preview-and-what-it-means-for-the-rest-of-us/Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400https://blog.redteamshell.com/posts/2026/06/the-floor-just-moved-project-glasswing-claude-mythos-preview-and-what-it-means-for-the-rest-of-us/<p><img src="https://blog.redteamshell.com/images/signature/01-hero.png" alt="Project Glasswing hero — a glasswing butterfly rendered as translucent wireframe circuit traces"></p> <p>For as long as most of us have been doing this work, the economics of offensive security have rested on one quiet assumption: <strong>finding a real, exploitable bug in hardened software is hard, slow, and expensive.</strong> It takes a scarce kind of person — someone who can read a million lines of C, hold a memory layout in their head, and patiently chain primitives until a crash becomes code execution. That scarcity is the whole reason a vulnerability can sit in OpenBSD for 27 years, or in FFmpeg through five million fuzzer hits, and never get caught.</p>